At Tingle Alley we are desperately typing on a top-secret project that will be revealed later this week. Actually, I can’t remember if this particular project is top-secret but I’m erring on the side of caution. (My poker face is legend at the Kremlin.)
But I had to break in with this hilarious rant from Jonathan Yardley. Hilarious, that is, as I’m not the one being eviscerated — Bret Lott is, for his writing memoir Before We Get Started.
Here is just a piece — a piece! — of the rant:
[Lott] makes the obligatory gestures to modesty (“my motto,” he says, is “I know nothing,” which he repeats so often you know he doesn’t mean a syllable of it) and to the obvious truth that “inspiration” is “unteachable,” but at core this “writer’s life” is the testament of one who has lockstepped his way through the academy and is nothing more than a die-stamped product of its assembly line. He mentions in what clearly is intended to be a mocking way the “rarified, even incestuous, world of a college campus,” yet that world is precisely where he has spent almost all his days since he forsook the fizz of RC Cola for the elixir of literature. He hangs around with all the other campus writers — the pages of Before We Get Started are littered with their names: Jayne Ann Phillips, Tobias Wolff, Charles Baxter et al. — and worships at the shrine of the late Raymond Carver, though he tells us in all smarmy modesty that “I was never a member of that hallowed group of people who knew him closely enough to call him Ray.”
Any claims Lott makes of being a serious, “literary” writer are thoroughly exploded by his penultimate chapter, “The Most Fragile Book,” in which he tells how his writing teacher at the community college, “a wild-haired, Harley-riding poet/professor from Cal State,” told his students to read “a book I’d never heard of,” The Catcher in the Rye. Talk about epiphanies! The blinding light that greeted Saint Paul on the road to Damascus was a dim bulb compared to the firestorm that J.D. Salinger’s stupendously overrated little novel ignited in the fluttering heart of young Bret Lott. It was “this amazing book, this totally true book, this genuinely real book,” the book “was about me, the me that’d been drifting what felt so many years,” and he reread it “four or five more times during the next several years, holding it dearer each time, admiring it more the deeper I went into my own life as a writer.”
Yardley followers will recall that the critic was similarly subdued and measured on the topic of Catcher in the Rye last fall. Citing Catcher in front of Yardley? Like waving a red flag in front of a bull.

That’s pretty funny. The WaPo editor must have known Yardley would go apeshit on this book. Unless J-Yard himself seeks out these open sores to pick at…
Comment by Jimmy Beck — 1/24/2005 @ 1:18 pm
Yardley’s rant sent me off to Amazon to have a look at other reviews. Both PW and Booklist were kind. Say, this is where Beatrix will come in handy . . . Ron?
Comment by Karen — 1/24/2005 @ 4:50 pm
Karen, I was thinking the same thing: This is a perfect one for Ron/Beatrix to tackle.
I have no idea how fair the review is. I am simply amused when anyone gets pissed enough, as J-Yard does here, that their words start coming out like a chant.
Comment by CAAF — 1/24/2005 @ 5:38 pm
I don’t know how fair it is either — I’m not familiar with Lott’s work. On the other hand, prose the likes of “totally true” and “genuinely real” is worrisome, so Yardley has a point. Catcher or no Catcher.
Comment by Karen — 1/24/2005 @ 6:31 pm
Following your excellent post, I went and read the whole review, and I must say it’s one of the best things I’ve read for months! The last few paragraphs are the funniest, to my mind, and the quotations that Yardley gives fully persuade me that this book deserves every word of the review. And Yardley’s last few sentences are genius. (Let’s just say that Lott’s book has redeemed itself by providing the occasion for Yardley’s review.)
Comment by Jenny D — 1/24/2005 @ 6:55 pm
Isn’t it a splendid rant? It’s one of my all-time faves.
A few years back, James Wolcott wrote an excellent rant on J-Franz (who I actually like). It was so piss-filled and hilarious I kept a copy on my computer at work — and every month or so I’d open it up and reread it. It was just so invigorating. A good rant is hard to beat.
My favorite bits here are the withering allusion to R.C. Cola and the sentence, “The blinding light that greeted Saint Paul on the road to Damascus was a dim bulb compared to the firestorm that J.D. Salinger’s stupendously overrated little novel ignited in the fluttering heart of young Bret Lott.”
Comment by CAAF — 1/24/2005 @ 8:09 pm